The mid-month Q&A meeting and thinking exchange meeting were held as scheduled in November

On the afternoon of November 17, 2022, the laboratory held a mid-month Q&A session in the A1006 seminar room of the Xinzhi Building. This Q&A session consisted of three parts: scientific research Q&A and project reporting, paper review, and general degree management application. First, the teacher gave detailed guidance on the questions encountered by the students in scientific research and engineering, and put forward the core viewpoint of “taking me as the main”: whether doing scientific research or engineering, we should stick to our own original goals and not lose our direction because of other opinions. Afterward, Shuang Qiao reported on recent review work. In the degree management application session, Zhouji Wang, Kui Li, and Siqi Gu applied to include their work in general degree management and introduced their application reasons, scientific research projects, public service work, and positive effects if their applications were approved and suggestions for other students. 20 teachers and students from the laboratory attended this meeting.

On the afternoon of December 1st, the laboratory held a Siqi Exchange Meeting in the A1006 conference room of the Xinzhi Building. First, each department of the laboratory reported on this month’s public service work: the office completed the preparation for the annual meeting, the construction of the laboratory website, and the construction of the laboratory booth; the scientific research department reported on the paper management plan and progress of project and technology achievement transformation; The organization department announced the results of November learning points management, monthly public service evaluation and class division job evaluation. Next, students from the laboratory reported on their recent scientific research and project progress, and teachers answered questions and provided guidance on their work. Among them, Yuhan Pan was rated as “excellent” for his outstanding project progress in this report. In the final review session, the teacher pointed out that the laboratory should focus on evaluating contributions to manuscripts. 21 teachers and students from the laboratory attended this meeting.


Zhaoyuan Xu